Three Peed?

 Yes, I am writing about the results of the Stupor Bowl held in New Orleans yesterday. I didn't watch the game. However, about midnight our old dog woke me up with a urination emergency. She needed to go out in the rain. When we returned to the warmth of the living room, I turned the television on and saw the news from New Orleans. It seems that Kelce, mighty Kelce had struck out.

I receive the A.M. Spectator newsletter on weekdays from the American Spectator magazine. Last week, they invited readers to submit their forecast on the Super Bowl final score. This guy, who hasn't watched a game all year, was closest with a projection of the Eagles winning 35-21. Ahhh, the glory of victory.

A friend sent me a link to a video of the Dunkin Donuts commercial that ran during yesterday's game. There was also a six-minute video out of which the one-minute commercial was cut. It was pretty funny. I loved the part where they ridiculed Starbucks. One guy in the ad said, "Who wants to wait thirty minutes for them to misspell my name on a cup?" Yeah, I am not a Starbucks customer. Actually, I have never drank a cup of coffee. I didn't drink coffee when it was ten cents a cup at the Waffle House, I sure wouldn't drink whatever that liquid gold is that they serve at Starbucks.

All that I heard about the Super Bowl for the last couple of weeks was that the Kansas City Chiefs were going to "three-peat". Instead, you have the title of this post. Were the three named Mahomes, Kelce and Biden?

Hostages being released by Hamas look like Holocaust survivors; Trump was right. Of course, that just fits right in with the Hamas goal of killing all of the Jews.  Let's quit treating Hamas as some kind of heroes pursuing a noble cause. It's time to take action against those here marching in support of Hamas.

With Trump trying to reduce the size of the Federal government, the Democrats have come out in support of inefficiency, waste and corruption. The millions spent by USAID to spread their gospel of transgenderism to other nations is enough of a reason to shut those folks down.

The Democrats are trying to justify wasting our tax dollars and are wasting our money going to court to preserve that system. Why should federal workers be exempt from losing their jobs? There are layoffs and terminations every day in private business.

Is there a taxpayer in this country who has never seen the bad side of the federal government? Were taxpayers more surprised by the nature of the waste in government or the size of the waste?

A couple of weeks ago, Senator Fauxchohontas Warren said, "There is nothing in the Constitution that says ordinary Americans have a right to see what we are spending tax dollars on."  We may need to redefine arrogance! It's time to decide who works for who. Memo to Fauxchohontas: You are being put on the endangered species list.

But wait!! There's a cure for a lot of this. It is term limits. Yes, term limits on both elected and appointed officials. We have a two-term limit on Presidents, but Senator is a lifetime job. There are many in the House of Representatives who have been there for more than forty years. This is what is causing many of our problems. These people aren't doing what's best for the nation, they are doing what is best for getting themselves re-elected. It's time to change this picture.

We need to end lifetime employment for federal workers. As is being shown right now, it is almost impossible to reduce the size of the federal workforce. You can't fire these people; you can't lay them off. They are sucking up your tax dollars until they are ready to leave. Those of us paying for this don't enjoy that level of job security. Something's got to give!

There's an old story about a guy who worked at the Department of Agriculture in Washington. One day, he went into the office and the guy at the next desk was crying. He walked up to him and asked, "What is wrong?" The guy looked up and said, "My farmer died." And that's the way it works in Washington, D.C.