Democrats and Sex Offenders?

Democrats are trying to go ahead and cancel the upcoming election since they think that they are ahead in all of the polls. They may be, but let's go ahead and vote anyway.

How about that MS-NOW telling people that Kash Patel was landing in Moscow while he was actually at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia? Maybe they should hire a geography expert?

Here's just a quick refresher for you on history. Despite the polls and the newspaper headlines, there was never a President Dewey.

It's quicker to write "communist" than "Democratic Socialist". Stay tuned for more tips on synonyms.

Here in North Carolina, the polls tell us that Roy Cooper is way ahead of Michael Whatley. I am a registered Republican, and I think that Whatley is running a horseshit campaign. Here's a pointer, Michael. If you are fighting with a pig, you are going to have to get down and dirty to win, Cooper is a political pig.

I am fascinated by the liberals in the Cooper-Whatley race. Democrats are all upset about a sex offender who is in the Whatley campaign as a member of the NC Republican Party. Despite Roy Cooper's claims, Whatley did not hire Harvey West for that. West is a member of the party structure; he was already there. Shall we survey the list of Democratic party members for sex offenders? Do you honestly believe that the Democratic Party structure is free of child sex offenders? This is what makes the sight of Democrats screaming about Epstein laughable. Two words, Bill Clinton or Bill Gates

For Democrats to scream about a sex offender in the political system is the absolute height of hypocrisy as there is no evidence of them ever labeling one of their own members as a sex offender and condemning him or her.. 

Here are my thoughts on sex offenders because I have employed several over the years. First, once convicted they need mental health treatment. If that doesn't work, they may require surgical modifications. I think that all need supervision and that would be human contact, not an electronic ankle bracelet.

Allow me to state what I believe are some obvious facts. I believe that they need intense supervision to keep them from becoming repeat offenders. I also believe that many of them can still contribute something to society.

Over the last fifty years, I have employed several sex offenders. Let's also realize that not all sex offenders are not all child sex offenders. "Sex offenders" covers a pretty broad spectrum of criminal behavior. Let's be honest here, if these people can't work and support themselves, they will probably get into more trouble. As a society, we have an obligation to give these people another chance to live a life outside of a prison. Some will take it; some will end up quickly back in prison.

Employing sex offenders is like hiring other people with criminal records. You must place them in a job that will not enable them to repeat their crimes. You don't let embezzlers work the cash register. You don't let child sex offenders work with young people. You don't hire delivery drivers with a record of several DUIs. We probably don't hire prostitutes to work as hostesses, but then again?

If we are going to make this great experiment of democracy and individual freedom work, we are going to have to solve some of these problems with criminals. We can't build enough prisons for everybody. We have to try another plan. If you don't agree with my plan, what's yours?